1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 739 F.Supp.
  5. 739 F.Supp. 564 (1989)
 

HARRIS v. ALLEN

No. CIV-89-1048-R.

739 F.Supp. 564 (1989)

Charles Curtis HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Earl ALLEN, Respondent.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

August 17, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Curtis Harris, pro se.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Steven Spears Kerr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, Okl., for respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.

Petitioner, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Respondent has filed his Rule 5 response to the petition, and the Petitioner has replied thereto. Thus the matter is at issue. The Court determines that an evidentiary hearing is not necessary, as the issues can be resolved on the basis of the record.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases