1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 443 N.W.2d
  5. 443 N.W.2d 857 (1989)
 

PEARCE v. LINDSTROM

No. C5-89-636.

443 N.W.2d 857 (1989)

Dean A. PEARCE, et al., Respondents, v. Robert M. LINDSTROM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin Eide, Hauge, Eide & Keller, P.A., Eagan, for respondents.

Michael A. Klutho, Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and IRVINE, JJ.

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Robert Lindstrom appeals an order vacating a judgment pursuant to Minn.R. Civ.P. 60.02. Dean A. and V. Lee Pearce instituted a legal malpractice action against Lindstrom which went to nonbinding arbitration pursuant to Special Rules of Practice for the Fourth Judicial District. The trial court entered judgment in the Pearces' favor and, five days later, the Pearces moved to vacate the judgment under Minn. R.Civ.P. 60.02, claiming excusable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases