TEMPLE v. KERWIN

Docket No. H004200.

209 Cal.App.3d 1087 (1989)

257 Cal. Rptr. 651

HAROLD TEMPLE et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DAVID S. KERWIN, Defendant and Respondent; JAMES A. EDMONDS, JR., as Real Estate Commissioner, etc., Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

April 20, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Timothy G. Laddish and Richard F. Finn, Deputy Attorneys General, for Appellant and Real Party in Interest.

Duane W. Shewaga and Adleson, Hess, Christensen & Kelly for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

CAPACCIOLI, J.

The Real Estate Commissioner appeals from an order directing him to pay $20,000 to Harold and Alta Temple from the Real Estate Recovery Account. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 10470 et seq.)1 The only issue is the amount unpaid on the Temples' judgment against David S. Kerwin, a real estate licensee "... which represents an actual and direct loss to the [Temples] in the transaction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases