1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 770 P.2d
  5. 770 P.2d 517 (1989)
 

HAUG v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN R. CO.

Nos. 88-438, 88-470.

770 P.2d 517 (1989)

David HAUG, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. Herbert LAY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided March 7, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Young, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Blewett, Great Falls, Herbert L. Pierce, III, Crowley, Haughey, Hanson, Toole and Dietrich, Billings, for Burlington Northern R. Co.

Alexander Blewett, III, Kurt M. Jackson, Hoyt & Blewett, Great Falls, for David Haug and Herbert Lay.

John W. Larson, Missoula, for amicus curiae.

WEBER, Justice.

The two cases of Haug v. Burlington Northern and Lay v. Burlington Northern have been consolidated for our consideration since the identical issues are raised in each case. In both cases, Burlington Northern appeals the decision of the District Court for the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, denying its motion for a change of venue. We affirm the District Court's denial of that motion.

We rephrase the issues presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases