1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 541 So.2d
  5. 541 So.2d 740 (1989)
 

RAINERMAN v. EAGLE NAT. BANK OF MIAMI

No. 88-1302.

541 So.2d 740 (1989)

Arturo RAINERMAN, Appellant, v. EAGLE NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Myles J. Tralins, Miami, for appellant.

Holland & Knight and Luis O'Naghten, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Arturo Rainerman, contends that it is sufficient, in order to sustain a claimed fifth-amendment privilege, to show that the nature of the proceeding, or setting where the claim is made, is such that a response to any relevant question might be incriminating. See Compton v. Societe Eurosuisse, S.A., 494 F.Supp. 836 (S.D.Fla. 1980) (a witness may properly invoke the privilege against self-incrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases