LETTS, Judge.
The defendant claims that a new trial and/or a mistrial should have been granted because of prejudicial testimony from a police witness in describing the geographical area in which the defendant was arrested for the sale of cocaine. We affirm.
We cannot but agree that there are several decisions out of this court holding that negative remarks about a geographical location are prejudicial and reversible. For example, in Beneby v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.