1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 774 P.2d
  5. 774 P.2d 489 (1989)
 

MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. $5,650 U.S. CURRENCY

A8608-04859; A8512-07963, CA A48241 (Control); CA A48456.

774 P.2d 489 (1989)

96 Or.App. 420

MULTNOMAH COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon, Respondent, v. $5,650 in U.S. CURRENCY, One 1984 Bmw 2-D Sedan, Vin WBAAK7408E8705670, and One 1979 Honda 2-D, or Lic. Btl 787, Defendants, Kenneth Wells, Appellant, and Joyce Stewart, Respondent. Multnomah County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon, Respondent, v. Proceeds of First Interstate Bank of Oregon Account # 1040029661, in the Name of Roosevelt Dossie; Proceeds of First Interstate Bank of Oregon Account # 1040000535, in the Name of Roosevelt Dossie; and the Proceeds of First Interstate Bank of Oregon Cashier's Check No. 00925 in the Amount of $84,770.60 and Proceeds of First Interstate Bank of Oregon Cashier's Check No. 00923 in the Amount of $4,974.18, Defendants, Roosevelt Dossie, Appellant, Rose Dossie and Rosalyn Robertson, Intervenors.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 10, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied June 30, 1989.

Review Denied August 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Matasar, Portland, argued the cause for appellant Kenneth Wells. With him on the brief was Hoffman, Matasar & Glaeser, Portland.

Jennifer Jane Martin, Deputy Dist. Atty., Portland, argued the cause for respondent Multnomah County. With her on the brief was Michael D. Schrunk, Dist. Atty., Portland.

Claud Ingram, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant Roosevelt Dossie.

No appearance for respondent Joyce Stewart.

No appearance for intervenors.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Multnomah County brought these two forfeiture proceedings pursuant to Multnomah County Ordinance Chapter 7.85.1 In each case, the trial court ordered forfeiture of the "defendant" property. "Claimants," the owners of the property, appeal. We consolidate the separate appeals for the purpose of this opinion.

In both cases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases