PAINEWEBBER INC. v. PITCHFORD

Nos. 88 Civ. 4400, 88 Civ. 4401, 89 Civ. 3227.

721 F.Supp. 542 (1989)

PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. James M. PITCHFORD and J & F Supermarkets, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, Respondents. PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. Joseph BUECHOT, Ray Conway, James English, Key Trust, Gerald Kinder, Mr. and Mrs. William Neidermeyer, Pat Rutherford, Mr. and Mrs. Christopher Skambis, Steve Slack, and Mr. and Mrs. Charles Vedrody, Respondents. PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. Bert H. BISHOP and M. Elizabeth Bishop, Respondents.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 14, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sarah G. Anderson, PaineWebber Inc. Legal Dept., New York City, for petitioner.

Carl Kuntz, Brandeis, Bernstein, Pollack & Greene, New York City, Stuart Goldberg, Goldberg & Schneider, Robert Dyer, Duckworth, Allen, Dyer & Poppelt, Orlando, Fla., for respondents.


OPINION AND ORDER

CONBOY, District Judge:

These cases arise out of similar factual situations and require the same legal analysis to resolve the pending motions. Accordingly, although the actions are not formally consolidated, we will treat all of the motions submitted in each action in this omnibus opinion. The common issue in all three cases, the facts of each which will be further elaborated upon below, concerns the proper arbitral forum for lawsuits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases