1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 442 N.W.2d
  5. 442 N.W.2d 812 (1989)
 

BLOHM v. MINNEAPOLIS UROLOGICAL SURGEONS

No. C6-88-2515.

442 N.W.2d 812 (1989)

Roger D. BLOHM, et al., Respondents, v. MINNEAPOLIS UROLOGICAL SURGEONS, P.A., et al., Respondents, Metropolitan Internists, P.A., et al., Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted August 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reed K. Mackenzie, Mackenzie & Hallberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for Blohm.

Donna J. Blazevic, Bassford, Heckt, et al., Minneapolis, for Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A.

Robert E. Salmon, Meagher, Geer, Markham, et al., Minneapolis, for Metropolitan Internists, P.A.

Kathryn Helen Davis, Minneapolis, amicus Minnesota Defense Lawyers' Ass'n.

John F. Eisberg, St. Paul, amicus Minnesota, Trial Lawyers Ass'n.

Heard, considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and SHORT and LESLIE, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to restrain the trial court's enforcement of its order denying leave to conduct an informal discussion pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 595.02, subd. 5 (1988). The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

FACTS

Roger and Delores Blohm commenced a malpractice action against petitioners Dr. Peter Kieley and Metropolitan Internists and against respondents Dr. William Price and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases