MER PROPERTIES v. GOLDEN PALACE

No. 8819DC847.

382 S.E.2d 869 (1989)

MER PROPERTIES — SALISBURY, a Partnership, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN PALACE, INC., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 5, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kluttz, Hamlin, Reamer, Blankenship, and Kluttz by Malcolm B. Blankenship, Jr., Salisbury, for plaintiff.

Shuford, Caddell & McCanless by R. William McCanless, Salisbury, for defendant.


BECTON, Judge.

In plaintiff's judgment action for summary ejectment, the Magistrate entered judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appealed, and, after a trial de novo in district court, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant.

Although plaintiff asserts numerous assignments of error, the controlling issue in its appeal to this court is whether defendant's notice of renewal, sent by ordinary first class mail, was sufficient to exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases