1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 541 So.2d
  5. 541 So.2d 705 (1989)
 

NORTH BROWARD RADIOLOGISTS, P.A. v. RUSH

No. 88-0296.

541 So.2d 705 (1989)

NORTH BROWARD RADIOLOGISTS, P.A., Appellant, v. Michael J. RUSH, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Clarification Denied May 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gale C. Payne and James C. Pilkey of Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Edward J. Richardson and Brian P. Rush of Woodlief, Rush, Smith & Richardson, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from dismissal of a complaint with prejudice. We do not attempt to second-guess the trial court as to the reasons for dismissal of the various counts of the complaint, which were based upon several different causes of action. We hold simply that the complaint did sufficiently allege a cause of action for tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship (see, e.g., DeRitis v. AHZ Corp., 444 So.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases