1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 784 P.2d
  5. 784 P.2d 452 (1989)
 

SHLIM v. CHARAPATA, INC.

82-4-149; CA A50104.

784 P.2d 452 (1989)

100 Or.App. 52

Sylvia L. SHLIM, Respondent, v. CHARAPATA, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant, CML, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 28, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Mills, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. With him on the brief was Mills & McMillin, P.C., Salem.

John Heald, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief was Zikes, Kayser, Heald & Chock, P.C., Portland.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

EDMONDS, Judge.

Garnishee CML appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Shlim based on a garnishment of a debt owed by CML to defendant Charapata.1 CML argues that it does not owe any money to Charapata and that an unliquidated claim cannot be the subject of a garnishment. We affirm.

Shlim leased commercial property to Charapata, which later subleased the property to CML. Charapata defaulted on its lease obligations. Shlim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases