1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 442 N.W.2d
  5. 442 N.W.2d 786 (1989)
 

MAMMENGA v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES

No. C1-88-512.

442 N.W.2d 786 (1989)

Mary MAMMENGA, Respondent, v. STATE of Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Petitioners, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., John L. Kirwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and D. Gerald Wilhelm, Martin County Atty., Fairmont, for petitioners, appellants.

Charles H. Thomas, Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services, Inc., Mankato, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

SIMONETT, Justice.

We conclude that the agency rule by which respondent was denied general assistance (GA) benefits is a valid rule. We reverse the court of appeals.

To be eligible for GA benefits, a person must be without certain income and financial resources and, since 1985, must also come within one of the categories for ongoing eligibility. These categories, 16 in number, were installed by the 1985 legislature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases