INLAND MANPOWER ASS'N v. U.S. DEPT. OF LABOR

No. 88-7260.

882 F.2d 343 (1989)

INLAND MANPOWER ASSOCIATION, a California public entity exercising joint powers, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Memorandum June 28, 1989.

Order and Opinion August 8, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul S. Mordy, Deputy County Counsel, San Bernardino, Cal., for petitioner.

Charles F. James, Attorney, Office of the Sol., U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before FARRIS, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

The facts are not in dispute. We review de novo the legal question whether proceedings to recoup misspent CETA funds are barred if not brought before September 30, 1984. See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.1984). Whether proceedings were brought before September 30, 1984 is a mixed question of fact and law in which the legal issues predominate. We review such questions de novo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases