1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 18 Conn.
  5. 18 Conn. App. 104 (1989)
 

STATE v. ROGERS

(6910), (6911)

18 Conn. App. 104 (1989)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MAURA ROGERS STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PAUL ROGERS

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy J. Sugrue, deputy assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Francis J. McQuade, assistant state's attorney, for the appellant (state).

Richard T. Meehan, Sr., with whom were Richard T. Meehan, Jr., and Judith Stevens, for the appellees (defendants).

BORDEN, DALY and NORCOTT, JS.

BORDEN, J.

In these consolidated cases, the state appeals, with the permission of the trial court, from the judgments dismissing the informations following the granting of the defendants' motions to suppress. The state claims that, because some of the seized items were admissible under the "independent source" exception to the exclusionary rule, the trial court committed plain error by suppressing all the results of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases