1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 772 P.2d
  5. 772 P.2d 449 (1989)
 

STATE v. SAN ANTONIO

P24856; CA A47361.

772 P.2d 449 (1989)

96 Or.App. 282

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Teddy SAN ANTONIO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 20, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Teresa Ozias, Certified Law Student, Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and RIGGS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant challenges a condition of probation requiring that he pay $237.50 in court appointed attorney fees. Defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicants. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for two years. The court subsequently found that he had violated certain conditions of probation, but it continued probation and added the additional condition that he reimburse the state for court appointed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases