1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 553 A.2d
  5. 553 A.2d 663 (1989)
 

ROY v. DANIS

553 A.2d 663 (1989)

Gerard A. ROY v. Carle G. DANIS and Arundel Auto Service, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided January 31, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Smith (orally), Smith & O'Toole, Biddeford, for plaintiff.

Dana E. Prescott (orally), Potter & Prescott, Saco, for defendants.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and HORNBY, JJ.

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The plaintiff Gerard A. Roy appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County, McKinley, J.) entered on a directed verdict granted to the defendants, Carle E. Danis and Arundel Auto Service, Inc., in an action by Roy seeking damages from the defendants for their breach of a contract with Roy. Our review of the record discloses that the trial court properly found that as a matter of law there was no contract between the parties, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases