1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 888 F.2d
  5. 888 F.2d 327 (1989)
 

HURLEY v. PATAPSCO & BACK RIVERS R. CO.

No. 89-2909.

888 F.2d 327 (1989)

Michael W. HURLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PATAPSCO & BACK RIVERS RAILROAD COMPANY, a body corporate, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided November 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald Francis Gay (Herbert J. Arnold, Arnold, Beauchemin & Tingle, P.A., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Rudolph Lee Rose (Robert T. Franklin, P. Matthew Darby, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before POWELL, Associate Justice (Retired), United States Supreme Court, sitting by designation; WIDENER and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The questions presented are whether the district court erred in granting appellee's motion for a directed verdict at the end of appellant's case and in granting appellee's motion in limine to exclude certain evidence. We find no error, and accordingly affirm.

I.

Appellant Michael W. Hurley has been employed by appellee railroad company since July 7, 1974, as an expert machinist in the Locomotive Repair Shop. Prior to this employment,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases