NEWMAN v. QUIGG

No. 88-1312.

886 F.2d 329 (1989)

Joseph W. NEWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald J. QUIGG, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Newman, Lucedale, Miss., argued pro se.

Fred E. McKelvey, Office of the Solicitor, Arlington, Va., argued for defendant-appellee.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MAYER, Circuit Judges.


PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

At the Commissioner's request, the court has considered the application of 35 U.S.C. § 145 to the assessment of the costs of the appeal Newman v. Quigg, 877 F.2d 1575, 11 USPQ2d 1340 (Fed.Cir.1989).

Mr. Newman had filed a sparse Appendix; the Commissioner moved for permission to file a supplemental appendix, and duly filed nine volumes thereof. As Mr. Newman points...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases