MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF ELLIOTT

D7811-18437; CA A48568.

768 P.2d 446 (1989)

95 Or.App. 390

In the matter of the MARRIAGE OF Arlo B. ELLIOTT, Respondent, and Gwendoline E. Elliott, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack L. Kennedy, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Susan E. Watts, and Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland.

Jeffrey S. Matthews, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Albert A. Menashe, and Gevurtz, Menashe & Hergert, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this domestic relations case, wife appeals from a trial court order modifying a dissolution decree to reduce husband's spousal support obligation from $1,850 to $925 per month. On de novo review, we agree with the trial court that husband satisfied his burden to show that there has been a material change in circumstances since the original decree. However, we disagree with the trial court about the appropriate level of support.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases