U.S. v. DRAKE

Nos. 88-2175, 88-2176.

885 F.2d 323 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith DRAKE (88-2175), Reginald Clark (88-2176), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 18, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Haviland, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Flint, Mich., for U.S.

Thomas E. Kuhn (argued), Detroit, Mich., for Keith Drake.

Before GUY, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, defendants Keith Drake and Reginald Clark appeal their convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. The only error claimed concerns a comment made by the prosecutor during closing argument. It is alleged that the prosecutor, to the prejudice of the defendants, commented on their failure to testify or otherwise produce evidence. The district judge denied a timely motion for a mistrial.

Upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases