1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 772 P.2d
  5. 772 P.2d 418 (1989)
 

PERRY v. SAIF CORPORATION

WCB 85-07195; CA A44205; SC S35811.

772 P.2d 418 (1989)

307 Or. 654

In the matter of the Compensation of Cleo F. PERRY, Claimant. Cleo F. Perry, Respondent On Review, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Rug Doctor, Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted April 5, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christine Chute, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioners on review. On the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Darrell E. Bewley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Leo R. Probst, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.

PER CURIAM.

Claimant filed a claim alleging an aggravation under ORS 656.273(1), which provides:

"After the last award or arrangement of compensation, an injured worker is entitled to additional compensation, including medical services, for worsened conditions resulting from the original injury."

The issue in dispute is whether claimant has established "worsened conditions" within the aggravation period simply because he was hospitalized for treatment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases