Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress his pretrial identification. We conclude that the hearing court in denying the suppression motion correctly found that the viewing of defendant by Officer Heil was an inadvertent observation, rather than an intentionally arranged police identification procedure (see, People v Whisby,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.