1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 881 F.2d
  5. 881 F.2d 302 (1989)
 

VAN DORN PLASTIC MACHINERY CO. v. N.L.R.B.

Nos. 87-6359 and 88-5128.

881 F.2d 302 (1989)

VAN DORN PLASTIC MACHINERY COMPANY, Petitioner-Cross Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided August 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith A. Ashmus, argued, Gregory A. Jacobs, Thompson, Hine & Flory, James A. Marx, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner-cross respondent.

Aileen A. Armstrong, John C. Truesdale, Executive Secretary, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Paul Spielberg, Christopher Young, argued, Frederick C. Calatrello, N.L.R.B., Region 8, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent-cross petitioner.

Before: KENNEDY, KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner-appellant, Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Company (Van Dorn), has appealed a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board (Board), reported at 286 N.L.R.B. No. 117, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 1265, 1987-88 NLRB Dec. (CCH) ¶ 19,112 (1987), which concluded that Van Dorn had violated sections 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by unilaterally changing the paid lunch period offered to specific union employees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases