1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 875 F.2d
  5. 875 F.2d 300 (1989)
 

EVERPURE, INC. v. CUNO, INC.

Nos. 88-1612, 88-1613.

875 F.2d 300 (1989)

EVERPURE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUNO, INC., Defendant/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 17, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosanne J. Faraci, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were Kenneth J. Jurek, Mark I. Levy and Warren von Schleicher, Chicago, Ill.

John L. Cline, Willian, Brinks, Olds, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., argued, for defendant/cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Steven Z. Szczepanski, Cynthia A. Homan and Grantland G. Drutchas, Chicago, Ill.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge, and NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Everpure, Inc. (Everpure) appeals from a July 21, 1988 summary judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, No. CIVIL N-88-170 PCD (Dorsey, J.), based on a finding that Cuno Inc. (Cuno) did not infringe claims 1, 4, 5, and 6 of Everpure's United States Patent No. 3,746,171 ('171). Cuno cross-appeals the denial of attorney fees and Rule 11 sanctions and requests attorney fees on appeal. We affirm in all respects...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases