1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 869 F.2d
  5. 869 F.2d 301 (1989)
 

U.S. v. COSENTINO

Nos. 86-3090, 86-3098.

869 F.2d 301 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph R. COSENTINO, Sr. and Robert H. Patterson, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 8, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied March 22, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell H. Caplan, Jerome Rotenberg, Rosenfeld, Rotenberg, Schwartzman, Hafron & Shapiro, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellants.

Matthew R. Bettenhausen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Anton Valukas, U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 22, 1989.

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

We visit once more the issue of "intangible rights" raised by mail fraud cases in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 107 S.Ct. 2875, 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987). After a number of years during which the government successfully prosecuted defendants under the mail fraud statute for depriving people of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases