Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that the suppression court erred in denying his motion to suppress his pretrial identification. From our review of the record, we conclude that the suppression court correctly found that the pretrial identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive (see, Simmons v United States,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.