EDWARDS v. PULITZER PUB. CO.

No. C-89-0551 WHO.

716 F.Supp. 438 (1989)

Harry EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. The PULITZER PUBLISHING COMPANY, William F. Woo, Tom Wheatley, Does I-III, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 16, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin Stender, McTernan, Stender, Walsh & Schwartzbach and Karen N. Snell, Riordan & Rosenthal, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Robert B. Hoemeke, Lewis & Rice, St. Louis, Mo., and John E. Carne, Crosby, Heafey Roach & May, Oakland, Cal., for defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Harry Edwards, brought this suit against defendants The Pulitzer Publishing Company ("Pulitzer"), William F. Woo, and Tom Wheatley, alleging deceit, invasion of privacy, appropriation of name, and interference with prospective advantage. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). The Court finds it has personal jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases