1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 781 P.2d
  5. 781 P.2d 372 (1989)
 

PERRY v. SAIF

WCB 85-07195; CA A44205.

781 P.2d 372 (1989)

99 Or.App. 52

In the matter of the Compensation of Cleo F. PERRY, Claimant. Cleo F. Perry, Petitioner, v. SAIF Corporation and Rug Doctor, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo R. Probst, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Leo R. Probst & Associates, Portland.

Christine Chute, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Darrell E. Bewley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court. The only issue is whether claimant suffered a worsening of his compensable injury under the standard established in Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or. 345, 745 P.2d 775 (1987). On de novo review, we conclude that he has not.1 We therefore affirm the Workers' Compensation Board order that affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases