1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 878 F.2d
  5. 878 F.2d 272 (1989)
 

U.S. v. SHAH

Nos. 88-1061 to 88-1063, 88-1076 to 88-1078, 88-1085, 88-1086, 88-1115, 88-1119, 88-1123 and 88-1126.

878 F.2d 272 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Siddharth Shanabhai SHAH, Kenneth Dean Chandler, Ernest Roy Cassells, Jr., Gerald Chester Sealund, Jaime Quintanilla, David W. Burkhardt, Albert H. Lozano, James Howard Schlichtmann, Howard Schlichtmann, Thomas J. Lennon, Jaime Orlando Quintanilla, Gerald Chester Sealund, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne Flower Cumings, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant chandler.

Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, Christopher J. Cannon, Asst. Federal Public Defender, for defendant-appellant Quintanilla.

Doron Weinberg, Lynne S. Coffin, Larson & Weinberg, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Lennon.

Marcus S. Topel, Daniel F. Cook, Topel & Goodman, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Shah.

Marvin S. Cahn, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Burkhardt.

Stephen J. Perelson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Lorenzo.

William Pinkus, Santa Rosa, Cal., for defendant-appellant Cassells.

Joseph P. Russoniello, U.S. Atty., Sanford Svetcov, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, SNEED and HUG, Circuit Judges.

HUG, Circuit Judge:

Defendants appeal the district court's denial of their motions to dismiss the indictment or, in the alternative, to compel discovery of grand jury proceedings. We hold that the orders appealed from fail to meet the final judgment rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982) and dismiss the appeals.

I

Defendants were charged in a 47-count indictment with possessing cocaine and marijuana with intent to distribute, conspiring to do the same...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases