1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 872 F.2d
  5. 872 F.2d 278 (1989)
 

EVANSTON INS. CO. v. FRED A. TUCKER & CO., INC.

Nos. 87-4274, 87-4275.

872 F.2d 278 (1989)

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FRED A. TUCKER & CO., INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant, and James Rothaus and Jane Doe Rothaus; Harold Hanson and Severin Hjelle, Defendants-Appellants, and Insurance Company of North America, (INAPRO), Third Party Defendant Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Memorandum February 27, 1989.

Opinion April 13, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan H. Baris, Merrick, Hofstedt & Lindsey, P.S., Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellants.

Scott A. Milburn, Preston, Thurgrimson, Ellis & Holman, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A request for publication of the Memorandum filed on February 27, 1989 is granted. The disposition will be refiled as a per curiam published Opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

We construe a provision of an "Insurance Agents and Brokers Liability Policy" and determine the standing of James Rothaus and the Insurance Company of North America ("INAPRO") to appeal a declaratory judgment entered against other defendants.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases