1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 212 Cal.App.3d
  5. 212 Cal.App.3d 938 (1989)
 

HOPE REHABILITATION SERVICES v. DEPT. OF REHAB.

Docket No. C003809.

212 Cal.App.3d 938 (1989)

261 Cal. Rptr. 123

HOPE REHABILITATION SERVICES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 31, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

David Rosenberg and Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant & Hannegan for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Charlton D. Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Elizabeth C. Brandt and Barbara Haukedalen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

EVANS, Acting P.J.

Hope Rehabilitation Services (Hope) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for a writ of administrative mandate. The petition sought to overturn audit findings by the Department of Rehabilitation (Department) that required Hope to reimburse the Department $152,039.51. Hope contends the superior court should have applied the independent judgment test rather than the substantial evidence test in reviewing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases