Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant's claim that the in-court identification testimony and his custodial statement were the fruits of an illegal arrest is without merit. Defendant concedes that the police had sufficient suspicion to warrant his brief detention for purposes of a showup (see, People v Hicks,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
