Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
The suppression court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the sneakers because the evidence at the hearing supports the court's finding that defendant voluntarily gave them to the police and that he was not in custody at the time. Once the police had information that the sneakers belonged to someone else, they were justified in retaining them.
The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
