1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 216 Cal.App.3d
  5. 216 Cal.App.3d 916 (1989)
 

CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B034545.

216 Cal.App.3d 916 (1989)

265 Cal. Rptr. 461

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

December 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Tighe F. Hudson, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Richard A. Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, and Michael L. Klekner, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

GEORGE, J.

The County of Los Angeles, the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, Richard Dixon, Chief Administrative Officer of Los Angeles County, Mark Bloodgood, Auditor-Controller of Los Angeles County, the Municipal Court of the Los Angeles Judicial District, and its court administrator, Edward Kritzman (collectively referred to as County) appeal from a judgment granting issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases