Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment of conviction of third degree robbery, defendant contends that identification testimony was improperly admitted because it was the result of an unduly suggestive showup. Since defense counsel failed to challenge the showup in her omnibus motion and specifically agreed that there was no Wade issue, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
