Plaintiffs commenced this action in 1985 to quiet title to an 84-plus-acre parcel of land which they claimed to own by adverse possession. Supreme Court found defendant to be the title holder of record of the disputed property and indicated to counsel it intended to charge the jury the essentials of adverse possession pursuant to RPAPL 521 and 522. In fact the court charged RPAPL 512 verbatim, the essentials of adverse possession based...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.