1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 781 P.2d
  5. 781 P.2d 335 (1989)
 

SALEM POLICE EMP. UNION v. CITY OF SALEM

ERB UP-2-87; CA A43945; SC S35553.

781 P.2d 335 (1989)

308 Or. 383

SALEM POLICE EMPLOYEES UNION, Respondent On Review, v. CITY OF SALEM, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided October 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Lee, Salem, argued the case for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was William J. Juza, City Atty., Salem.

Michael J. Tedesco, Portland, argued the case for respondent on review. With him on the response was Steve Johansen, Portland.

Frank M. Parisi and C. Akin Blitz, Spears, Lubersky, Bledsoe, Anderson, Young & Hilliard, Portland, filed a brief on behalf of amici curiae Oregon State Sheriffs' Ass'n, Oregon Ass'n Chiefs of Police, Oregon Fire Chiefs' Ass'n, Oregon Fire Dist. Directors' Ass'n, Fred Pearce, Multnomah County Sheriff, City of Portland and City of Eugene.

FADELEY, Justice.

State law requires public employers and represented employees to bargain in good faith with each other "with respect to employment relations" when either requests bargaining. Refusal to do so when required by law is an unfair labor practice. ORS 243.672(1)(e), 243.650(4), 243.650(7).1

Petitioner City of Salem (City) adopted a reserve police officer program. Respondent

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases