1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 156 A.D.2d
  5. 156 A.D.2d 956 (1989)
 

BYDATEL CORP. v. CLARKE

156 A.D.2d 956 (1989)

Bydatel Corporation, Appellant, v. Richard J. Clarke et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

December 20, 1989

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Generally, it is the responsibility of the courts to interpret written instruments (see, Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v Wesolowski, 33 N.Y.2d 169; Mallad Constr. Corp. v County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 32 N.Y.2d 285). We conclude that Special Term, in interpreting the parties' document, correctly found that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases