Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant asserts that his statement to the police should have been suppressed because it was induced by a promise by the police that he would not be prosecuted if he returned the stolen property. We disagree. The police officer who questioned defendant denied making such promise and the suppression court found that no promises...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
