Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
Although the Second Department has held that a gap in treatment that exceeds the 2½-year period of limitations (see, CPLR 214-a) bars the application of the continuous course of treatment doctrine as a matter of law (see, Curcio v Ippolito,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.