Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his conviction of two counts of sodomy in the third degree is not supported by legally sufficient evidence that defendant was "twenty-one years old or more" (Penal Law § 130.40 [2]) when he engaged in deviate sexual intercourse with his 16-year-old daughter. We disagree. Contrary to defendant's claim, the trial court properly admitted the testimony regarding his age...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
