ROTT v. MITTLEIDER

Civ. No. 890011.

441 N.W.2d 645 (1989)

Virgil ROTT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Daniel MITTLEIDER, Mary Mittleider, Richard Kamletz and Kamletz Housemoving and Construction, Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

June 6, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Virgil Rott, Nortonville, pro se.

Gerald A. Kuhn (no appearance), Napoleon, for defendants and appellees Daniel and Mary Mittleider.

Buchanan Law Office, Jamestown, for defendants and appellees Richard Kamletz and Kamletz Housemoving and Constr. Argued by Daniel E. Buchanan.


ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Virgil Rott appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his action for damages against the defendants. We affirm.

Virgil asserts that he has an ownership interest in two lots located in the village of Nortonville (herein referred to as the property), and that the defendants have interfered with his interest in the property. The trial court, concluding that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that, as a matter of law, Virgil...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases