1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 383 S.E.2d
  5. 383 S.E.2d 702 (1989)
 

JORGENSEN v. SEEMAN

No. 8926DC179.

383 S.E.2d 702 (1989)

Dan JORGENSEN, d/b/a Danco Electric Company, Plaintiff, v. Daniel SEEMAN and Roberta Seeman, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 3, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. James Chandler, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Defendants-appellees failed to file a brief on their behalf and were not before the Court.

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiff Danco contests the denial of its motion under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 60(b). Rule 60(b)(6) is equitable in nature. Howell v. Howell, 321 N.C. 87, 91, 361 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1987). This section empowers the court with the authority to set aside or modify a final judgment, order or proceeding whenever such action is necessary to do justice under the circumstances. Id. A motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases