Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
There is no merit to defendant's contention that the suppression court erred in failing to suppress testimony concerning voice identification. There was no reasonable possibility that the challenged voice identification contributed to defendant's conviction, and thus any error in its admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Adams,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.