PER CURIAM.
The trial judge's ultimate finding — that the husband has the ability to pay the award of alimony and child support — includes an implicit finding that the husband's past income was higher than he testified to at trial and that his earning potential is greater than the meager salary he earns in a job he accepted on the eve of trial. That finding is amply supported by the record. See Seitz v. Seitz,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.