BASCUAS v. BASCUAS

No. 88-198.

538 So.2d 520 (1989)

Ernesto BASCUAS and Pro Investment Consultant, Inc., Appellants, v. Bertha BASCUAS, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 14, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Busso, Allen, Baker & Silverman and Steven Silverman, Miami, for appellants.

Andrew M. Leinoff, Coral Gables, Mark A. Gatica, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The trial judge's ultimate finding — that the husband has the ability to pay the award of alimony and child support — includes an implicit finding that the husband's past income was higher than he testified to at trial and that his earning potential is greater than the meager salary he earns in a job he accepted on the eve of trial. That finding is amply supported by the record. See Seitz v. Seitz, 471 So.2d 612

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases