SCHOTT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing his malpractice suit against defendant, a chiropractor, on the ground of prescription. The issue is whether the fact that plaintiff consulted an attorney because he thought the chiropractor had committed malpractice was sufficient to establish the requisite knowledge to support the running of prescription when he and the attorney were being told by two physicians that the chiropractor had not harmed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
