ROWE v. GOLDBERG

No. CX-88-1156.

435 N.W.2d 605 (1989)

Helen ROWE, Appellant, v. Ruth K. GOLDBERG, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 24, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael W. Unger, Hvass, Weisman & King, Chtd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

William K. Strifert, Taylor Law Firm, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and FOLEY and SCHUMACHER, JJ.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial based on claims of evidentiary errors, the limiting of the scope of expert testimony, and the failure of the trial court to give a requested jury instruction. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Helen Rowe was employed by respondent Ruth K. Goldberg as a housekeeper. Rowe cleaned Goldberg's home two times each month...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases