1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 721 F.Supp.
  5. 721 F.Supp. 314 (1989)
 

AOC INTERN., INC. v. U.S.

Court No. 87-01-00122.

721 F.Supp. 314 (1989)

AOC INTERNATIONAL, INC., Fulet Electronic Industrial Co., Ltd., Sampo Corp., and Tatung Co., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Zenith Electronics Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade.

September 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willkie Farr & Gallagher, Christopher Dunn, Washington, D.C., William J. Clinton, Zygmunt Jablonski and William B. Lindsey, for plaintiffs.

Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C., Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Jeanne E. Davidson, Dept. of Commerce, Leila J. Afzal, for defendant.

Frederick L. Ikenson, P.C., J. Eric Nissley, Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenor, Zenith Electronics Corp.

WATSON, Judge:

In this action, plaintiffs AOC International ("AOC"), Fulet Electronic Industrial Co. ("Fulet"), Sampo Corporation ("Sampo") and Tatung Company ("Tatung") challenge the final results of the first administrative review by the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ("ITA" or "Commerce") covering importations of color television receivers ("CTVs"), except for video monitors, from Taiwan which are subject to an antidumping duty order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases