1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 46 Ohio
  5. 46 Ohio St. 3d 55 (1989)
 

STATE EX REL. HARRELL v. STREETSBORD CITY SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN.

Nos. 88-1501 and 88-1502.

46 Ohio St. 3d 55 (1989)

THE STATE, EX REL. HARRELL, APPELLEE, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE STREETSBORO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLANT; STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. THE STATE, EX REL. CELIGOJ, APPELLEE, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE STREETSBORO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLANT; STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benito C. R. Antognoli, for appellees Harrell and Celigoj.

Gary L. Pierce and Ronald J. Habowski, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Lauren M. Ross, for appellee State Board of Education.

Per Curiam.

For a writ of mandamus to issue, a court must find that the relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that the respondent is under a corresponding clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. Freshour v. Radcliff (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 181, 519 N.E.2d 395; State, ex...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases